[net2-wg] Collection TEP draft

[Jonathan Hui]

I'd also argue that Intercept doen't add any bloat unless the
interface is used. nesC should just compile it away since it would be
dead code.

--
Jonathan W. Hui
jwhui at cs.berkeley.edu
http://www.cs.berkeley.edu/~jwhui/


On 2/10/06, Philip Levis <pal at cs.stanford.edu> wrote:
> On Feb 10, 2006, at 1:48 AM, henri dubois-ferriere wrote:
>
> > another question:
> > should providing Intercept be a MUST?
> > In the case of a lean collection implementation (ie for stg like
> > Drain), it might be  unnecessary and add needless bloat.
>
> My intuition is that Intercept is a MUST, while Snoop is a SHOULD or
> MAY. Without Intercept, you can't do in-network processing/
> suppression. But I suspect this intuition is as much a product of
> "it's how it's been done in the past" as anything else, and therefore
> is definitely worth discussion and scrutiny.
>
> Phil
> _______________________________________________
> net2-wg mailing list
> net2-wg at millennium.berkeley.edu
> https://mail.millennium.berkeley.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/net2-wg
>