[net2-wg] Link estimator tests
Rodrigo Fonseca
rfonseca at cs.berkeley.edu
Tue Jun 6 17:35:42 PDT 2006
The routing table will only accept nodes that are part of the LE
table, i.e., the routing table is a strict subset of the LE table. So
we should probably use the same constant there.
Rodrigo
On 6/6/06, Philip Levis <pal at cs.stanford.edu> wrote:
> I've run some tests on Om's link estimator, and it works pretty well.
> In very dense networks it selects good links and sticks with them. It
> adapts quickly to big changes (e.g., nodes dying).
>
> The one disconnect I see in the code right now (we can fix it for the
> release) is that the LE has 5 entries and the routing table has 12!
>
> I have not explored the interactions between routing table and link
> estimation table entries yet.
>
> Phil
> _______________________________________________
> net2-wg mailing list
> net2-wg at millennium.berkeley.edu
> https://mail.millennium.berkeley.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/net2-wg
>
More information about the net2-wg
mailing list