[net2-wg] Good result (very slow test)

[Rodrigo Fonseca]

That's right.

This is no stress test, nor is it supposed to claim anything. It's a
debugging test.
It's just a step in the right direction.

Rodrigo



On 6/14/06, Joe Polastre <joe at polastre.com> wrote:
> You only ran it for 10*72 = 720 seconds = 12 minutes??
>
> -Joe
>
> On 6/14/06, Rodrigo Fonseca <rfonseca at cs.berkeley.edu> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Sukun  ran an experiment on omega, with 10 nodes, 0 as the
> > basestation, all nodes sending every 10 seconds. We staggered the boot
> > time (actually, we staggered the first transmission).
> >
> > Question:
> >
> > I saw two sizes of packets: all packets that were from 1 hop away had
> > 0x0B bytes, while all packets with 2 hops had 0x13 bytes, as below:
> >
> > 00 FF FF 0B C9 EE 00 00 0F EE 00 00 00 00 0F DD 01
> > 00 FF FF 13 C9 EE 00 00 23 EE 00 0F 00 0A 0F B3 02 00 00 00 00 02 E6 0D FE
> >
> > I haven't checked yet, but is this intentional or is it a problem with
> > how the length field is treated in the forwarding?
> >
> > The results were 100% for all nodes (for all practical purposes):
> >
> > 0 = 72 ( 100 %)
> > 13 = 73 ( 101.389 %)
> > 14 = 72 ( 100 %)
> > 15 = 72 ( 100 %)
> > 23 = 72 ( 100 %)
> > 24 = 71 ( 98.6111 %)
> > 33 = 72 ( 100 %)
> > 34 = 72 ( 100 %)
> > 35 = 72 ( 100 %)
> > 44 = 72 ( 100 %)
> >
> > 13 was more probably because its timer fired first in the cycle.
> >
> > 292 packets were sent from 1 hop away (40.55%), 356 (49.44%) from 2
> > hops away, and 72 (10%) from the basestation itself.
> >
> > Sukun, can you run this with the higher rate again?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Rodrigo
> > _______________________________________________
> > net2-wg mailing list
> > net2-wg at millennium.berkeley.edu
> > https://mail.millennium.berkeley.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/net2-wg
> >
>