[net2-wg] Re: Today's agenda

[Rodrigo Fonseca]

This is mainly to Joe and Martin, but also ton anyone who may have
experience with this.

In the end of the teleconference today we decided to look at the
protocols that are to built on top of a one hop layer abstraction
(such as SP), to see (i) what they require and assume of the LL, and
(ii) if they have any need which is not provided by current LLs.

Since some of you have a working implementation of such a layer and a
number of protocols that use it, it would be good to have your
perspective on at least (i).
For (ii), in Moteiv's case, maybe it would amount to the question of
whether you had to add any extra functionality or interfaces to SP
that were not in the original implementation due to some unforeseen
requirement of some protocol. In Crossbow's case, it would be
interesting to see what the requirements are for the protocols they
use the most, and if SP fails to meet any of those.

Thanks,
Rodrigo


On 7/20/06, joe at polastre.com <joe at polastre.com> wrote:
> Hello from my mobile at LAX. I would like to participate in this
> discussion but my next flight leaves at 8:50. Can you make sure
> copious notes are taken? Thanks,
>
> -Joe
>
> On 7/20/06, Rodrigo Fonseca <rfonseca at cs.berkeley.edu> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > this week's meeting will be about the one-hop link abstraction, and
> > where to go from here.
> > "See"  you then,
> >
> > Rodrigo
> >
> > US: 1-916-356-2663 or 1-888-875-9370 (non-Intel)
> > UK: +44 1793 402663
> > Denmark: +45 4527 5090
> >
> >
> > Thursday, July 20, 2006 9:00 AM US Pacific Time
> > Bridge: 3, Passcode: 3982579
> > _______________________________________________
> > net2-wg mailing list
> > net2-wg at millennium.berkeley.edu
> > https://mail.millennium.berkeley.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/net2-wg
> >
>