[net2-wg] Re: T1->T2 porting / shim layer
Omprakash Gnawali
gnawali at usc.edu
Thu Feb 8 12:39:27 PST 2007
The interfaces used by the components in these modules are defined,
implemented, and maintained by the core WG so I think it would be
something that the core WG should look into. Phil, was there ever a
discussion on T1/T2 compatibility in the core WG?
Thanks.
- om_p
> Any word on the possibility of a T1->T2 shim to ease such code
> transition?
>
> It would be really nice if it were easy to get T1 code up and running
> quickly. Then T2 porting would be more optimization focused rather than
> an initial leap of faith.
>
> Martin
> __________________________________________________
> Martin Turon | Crossbow Technology, Inc.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: net2-wg-bounces at millennium.berkeley.edu
> [mailto:net2-wg-bounces at millennium.berkeley.edu] On Behalf Of Philip
> Levis
> Sent: Wednesday, February 07, 2007 8:52 PM
> To: Omprakash Gnawali
> Cc: net2-wg at millennium.berkeley.edu
> Subject: Re: [net2-wg] meeting reminder for 2/8/2007
>
> On Feb 7, 2007, at 6:02 PM, Omprakash Gnawali wrote:
>
> >
> > Call information for tomorrow's meeting:
> >
> > Thursday, February 08, 2007, 09:00 AM US Pacific Time
> > US: 1-916-356-2663 or 1-888-875-9370 (non-Intel)
> > UK: +44 1793 402663
> > Denmark: +45 4527 5090
> > Bridge: 4, Passcode: 5617461
> >
> > Agenda:
> > - Finalize the name for Link Quality estimation/discovery protocol
> > - Discuss TEP124
> > - Collection Status
>
> Unfortunately, I can't make the telecon tomorrow; the admissions
> committee is meeting 9-Noon.
>
> I've started examining how best to port MultihopLQI to T2. There are
> basically two ways to go: just port link estimation/routing and use
> CTP's queueing, or to port the whole deal over.
>
> Phil
> _______________________________________________
> net2-wg mailing list
> net2-wg at millennium.berkeley.edu
> https://mail.millennium.berkeley.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/net2-wg
More information about the net2-wg
mailing list