[net2-wg] ttx slides draft

[Omprakash Gnawali]

I think the plan is to say that in our test scenarios, CTP is known to
be very reliable and close to 100% but not quite 100%. The hope is
having some numbers handy will make it easier to explain that ...

- om_p

> Is this is a research presentation or a status presentation?  The
> current slides show a remarkable amount of progress; it isn't
> necessary in a 5 minute presentation to explain all the
> variations--likewise, don't show data that will take more than 5
> minutes to explain.
> 
> -Joe
> 
> On 4/27/07, Philip Levis <pal at cs.stanford.edu> wrote:
> > On Apr 27, 2007, at 6:46 PM, Kyle Jamieson wrote:
> >
> > > Hi All,
> > >
> > > Here's where I am on the slides for TTX tomorrow morning.  If you
> > > have any changes or comments, let me know.
> >
> > It would be good to quantify what caused those failures. We've also
> > seen experiments with 99%. So are those lost %s due to short-term
> > link variations, loops, or what?
> >
> > Phil
> > _______________________________________________
> > net2-wg mailing list
> > net2-wg at millennium.berkeley.edu
> > https://mail.millennium.berkeley.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/net2-wg
> >
> _______________________________________________
> net2-wg mailing list
> net2-wg at millennium.berkeley.edu
> https://mail.millennium.berkeley.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/net2-wg