[net2-wg] TEP 119

[Omprakash Gnawali]

I updated the TEP. Could someone make a pass before I send it to the shepherd?

Thanks.

- om_p

On Fri, May 2, 2008 at 11:51 AM, Omprakash Gnawali <gnawali at usc.edu> wrote:
> I can update the implementation section to reflect the new
>  component/interfaces for 4bitle and removal of LinkSrcPacket.
>
>  Romain, it seems like we won't describe UnicastNameFreeRouting in this
>  TEP. If you have any problem with this, please let us know quickly.
>
>  - om_p
>
>
>
>  On Thu, May 1, 2008 at 1:21 PM, Philip Levis <pal at cs.stanford.edu> wrote:
>  > I've incorporated the comments on TEP 119. The only one I did not address
>  > was Romain's, saying that it did not go into UnicastNameFreeRouting. I did
>  > not include this because it's a low-level detail of the internal
>  > implementation of lib/net/ctp, and so probably a bit out of scope, as it
>  > should not specify interfaces. Instead, it might make sense to, in the
>  > future, write a TEP that specifies the interface.
>  >
>  >  New versions attached.
>  >
>  >  Phil
>  >
>  >
>  >
>  >
>  >
>  >
>  > _______________________________________________
>  >  net2-wg mailing list
>  >  net2-wg at millennium.berkeley.edu
>  >  https://www.millennium.berkeley.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/net2-wg
>  >
>  >
>