[net2-wg] DHV / DIP

[dangtx at pdx.edu]

> - what platform was used?

MicaZ

> - what exactly is code size?
>

It is the size of the file build/micaz/main.srec after compiling.

Thanh

> --
> Razvan ME
>
> On Tue, 11 Aug 2009, dangtx at pdx.edu wrote:
>
>>
>> This is the pdf version.
>>
>> Thanh
>>
>> Quoting Philip Levis <pal at cs.stanford.edu>:
>>
>>> Can you send text or PDF? Text is best.
>>>
>>> Phil
>>>
>>> On Aug 11, 2009, at 11:46 PM, dangtx at pdx.edu wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi everyone,
>>>>
>>>> Thank you for letting me be part of the team. I attach a word  
>>>> file comparing DRIP/DIP/DHV in terms of implementation,  
>>>> performance, and characteristic. Some red texts indicate current  
>>>> issues or to do list for DHV. I will write a more accessible and  
>>>> concise description after getting your feedback as well as  
>>>> testing DHV thoroughly.
>>>>
>>>> thanks,
>>>>
>>>> Thanh
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Quoting Omprakash Gnawali <gnawali at usc.edu>:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi Thanh,
>>>>>
>>>>> It will be great if you can forward the document that compared DHV /
>>>>> DIP / Drip to this list. I hope to have you work with the team to test
>>>>> your code, and also write a concise description that compares these
>>>>> three protocols so that users know which one to use when.
>>>>>
>>>>> - om_p
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> <ProtocolComparison.doc>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>