[net2-wg] dhv release timeline

[Omprakash Gnawali]

2009/8/23 Razvan Musaloiu-E. <razvanm at cs.jhu.edu>:
> Hi!
>
> On Sun, 23 Aug 2009, dangtx at pdx.edu wrote:
>
>> There one assumption that DIP doesn't explicitly assume that is all the nodes have the same number of keys. DHV requires that assumption in order to work. However, both DIP and DHV don't yet explicitly address the case where nodes have different number of keys/programs, which can be part of the heterogeneity umbrella.
>
> I think the assumption that all the nodes have the same keys is reasonable. All the nodes need to participate in dissemination of all the keys anyway. If the nodes only propagate the keys they care about then some updates might never reach some nodes.

Are there any disadvantages of dhv relative to dip? Code size? memory?

- om_p