[SensorNetArch] Here's a new version of SPWAIST

[Philip Levis]

Agreed - I read the latest draft (as of 8AM?) on BART. On a higher 
level, the entire thing is too fuzzy and we contradict ourselves many 
times. The protocols section is excessively long while the power 
management section is content-free. I will start orchestrating in the 
next 1/2 hour or so, after I get CVS working properly and see the 
current draft.

Phil

On Feb 1, 2005, at 10:14 AM, David Culler wrote:

> I think it is odd that we focus on the local bcast and then spend 
> almost
> all of section 4 on namebased protocols.  What happened to the namefree
> protocols?
>
>
>
> Cheng Tien Ee wrote:
>
>> We need someone(s) to look at naming + power management too...
>>
>> Jerry Zhao wrote:
>>
>>
>>> I will check in these changes and make a pass on spwaist.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Jerry
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tue, 2005-02-01 at 09:16 -0800, David Culler wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>> It is "a position".  Still weak on the support, but I think it 
>>>> states
>>>> the position more directly.
>>>>
>>>> Somebody want to drop these into CVS.  I haven't set mine up yet.
>>>>
>>>> I'll spend a bit of time on lecture now and see where things stand 
>>>> at 10.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> SensorNetArch mailing list
>>> SensorNetArch at Millennium.Berkeley.EDU
>>> http://Mail.Millennium.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/sensornetarch
>>>
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> SensorNetArch mailing list
>> SensorNetArch at Millennium.Berkeley.EDU
>> http://Mail.Millennium.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/sensornetarch
> _______________________________________________
> SensorNetArch mailing list
> SensorNetArch at Millennium.Berkeley.EDU
> http://Mail.Millennium.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/sensornetarch
>
-------

"We shall not cease from exploration
And the end of all our exploring
Will be to arrive where we started
And know the place for the first time."

- T. S. Eliot,  'Little Gidding'