[SensorNetArch] idle question

[David Culler]

I agree

Scott Shenker wrote:
> I would advocate putting sensor somewhere in the title, and only in the 
> conclusion/discussion say that we don't see why this doesn't apply to 
> all wireless links, but that we haven't done a thorough enough 
> investigation to make such a claim.
> 
> I'm worried that our title, without qualification, will piss off some 
> readers (particularly because the text is sensor specific).
> 
> On Apr 6, 2005, at 10:40 AM, Joe Polastre wrote:
> 
>> I'm pretty convinced that this will run on any wireless link whether
>> it is 802.11 or 802.15.4...
>>
>> But I'm fairly biased, so it would be good to get others opinions.
>>
>> On Apr 6, 2005 8:01 AM, Scott Shenker <shenker at icsi.berkeley.edu> wrote:
>>
>>> Do we need the term Sensors or Sensornets in our title?  To what extent
>>> can we claim this applies to all wireless networks?
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> SensorNetArch mailing list
>>> SensorNetArch at Millennium.Berkeley.EDU
>>> http://Mail.Millennium.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/sensornetarch
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> SensorNetArch mailing list
>> SensorNetArch at Millennium.Berkeley.EDU
>> http://Mail.Millennium.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/sensornetarch
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> SensorNetArch mailing list
> SensorNetArch at Millennium.Berkeley.EDU
> http://Mail.Millennium.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/sensornetarch