[Tinyos-1.2wg] RE: Tools for 1.2

[Buonadonna, Phil]

-xscale-elf-gcc suite.

-iMote2 programming tool (Hopefully this will just be uisp)

-jetty (for task)


pb 

-----Original Message-----
From: David Gay [mailto:dgay42 at gmail.com] 
Sent: Friday, February 18, 2005 4:46 PM
To: pbuonado at intel-research.net; Cory Sharp; tinyos-1.2;
kwright at cs.berkeley.edu
Subject: Re: Tools for 1.2

This got garbled. That should read: "We're going to have a common
toolchain...". And I bet tinyos-1.2wg won't accept your answers, so
please reply to me and Kristin...

David


On Fri, 18 Feb 2005 16:44:09 -0800, David Gay <dgay42 at gmail.com> wrote:
> We're g a common toolchain for 1.2 and 2.0, do either of you have
> additional feedback on what versions of what tools we need to build?
> 
> David
> 
> 
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Gay <dgay42 at gmail.com>
> Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2005 16:41:29 -0800
> Subject: Tools for 1.2
> To: "tinyos-1.2" <tinyos-1.2wg at mail.millennium.berkeley.edu>
> 
> General
> -------
> 
> nesC: 1.2 (don't build yet)
> Java: do we want to switch to Java 1.5? Note that the IBM JVM is still
at 1.4.
> 
> make: we need Phil's patched 3.80 make (it should install to
> /usr/local/bin to avoid clashing with the system standard one).
> 
> graphviz: I suggest sticking with 1.10 (is there any reason to
change?)
> 
> We should make our rpms install to /usr, rather than /usr/local (note
> that build-mspgcc uses /opt/msp430 at the moment).
> 
> gcc, gdb, binutils are at ftp://ftp.gnu.org/pub/gnu/
> 
> AVR
> ---
> avr-gcc 3.4.3
> avr-binutils: 2.15
> avr-insight (gdb) 6.3
> avarice 2.3.20041206 (that's "latest CVS")
> avr-libc 1.2.3 (http://savannah.nongnu.org/download/avr-libc/)
> uisp: what's in tools/src/uisp (will be part of tinyos-tools-avr)
> 
> MSP
> ---
> whatever the build-mspgcc scripts does (but, afaik, it actually does
> some amount of "fetch the latest version", so we should note what we
> actually fetched).
> 
> msp430-bsl (what's in tools/src/mspgcc-pybsl - this will need work I
> believe - it doesn't work out-of-the-box on Linux at least)
> 
> ARM
> ---
> 
> Not necessary for 1.2, but we can at least start working on the
> story... Phil B., any suggestions?
> 
> David
>