[Tinyos-1.2wg] Re: 1.2 toolset

[Ion Yannopoulos]

David Gay wrote:

>I'm using FC3 for what it's worth. I suspect that whatever we do will
>work w/ Redhat 9 => FC3, the question is really what we want to test
>things on.
>  
>
I'd argue RH9, and FC2 at a minimum.  FC1 does not seem to have many 
adherents but many people are using FC2, and many are still on RH9.  
Check out Kristin's poll on tinyos.net.

>avr-gcc (plus avarice, binutils,insight,libc):
>  
>
>4.0 is looking more promising now that they've fixed the internal
>error when attempting to build avr-gcc ;-) I'll give it a try again.
>Need to check on versions for binutils, gdb (aka insight), avr-libc
>too.
>
>In general, I think it's best to get the latest (stable) versions of
>tools. Reduces the pressure to update them soon... Disagreements?
>  
>
That sounds reasonable to me.

Let's either continue this on 1.2 or on both lists, if people on 2.0 
want to discuss it.

Ion
_______________________________________________
Tinyos-1.2wg mailing list
Tinyos-1.2wg at Mail.Millennium.Berkeley.EDU
http://mail.millennium.berkeley.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tinyos-1.2wg