[Tinyos-2.0wg] AMPacket

[Jonathan Hui]

I meant to reply to the i2c discussion, but I guess it can apply here as 
well :-)

--
Jonathan Hui
jhui at archrock.com

Jonathan Hui wrote:
> 
> Yeah, go ahead and check the changes in. That'll be a good forcing 
> function to get everything else in line.
> 
> -- 
> Jonathan Hui
> jhui at archrock.com
> 
> henri dubois-ferriere wrote:
>> On 01/08/06, Philip Levis <pal at cs.stanford.edu> wrote:
>>> Following the discussion two weeks ago and the agreement that
>>> AMPacket should have a source accessor, I've updated the Serial,
>>> CC1000, and CC2420 implementations to provide such. Serial raises a
>>> few interesting issues, as currently the BaseStation acts through
>>> SerialActiveMessageC. Setting the source is fairly meaningless (you
>>> know which node it is from the connection point), so in my version
>>> SerialActiveMessageC does not set the source address.
>>>
>>> I am ready to check these changes in, but wanted to give people a
>>> head's up. This is going to affect *all* AM communication
>>> abstractions. For example, the TDA5250 will require a source address
>>> in its packet, as will the xe1205. I just wanted to check that
>>> everyone is OK with this.
>>>
>>
>> sounds good to me (but might not get to updateing the xe1205 stuff
>> until next week)
>> henri
>>
>>
>>
>>> Phil
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Tinyos-2.0wg mailing list
>>> Tinyos-2.0wg at Mail.Millennium.Berkeley.EDU
>>> https://mail.millennium.berkeley.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tinyos-2.0wg 
>>>
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Tinyos-2.0wg mailing list
>> Tinyos-2.0wg at Mail.Millennium.Berkeley.EDU
>> https://mail.millennium.berkeley.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tinyos-2.0wg 
>>
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Tinyos-2.0wg mailing list
> Tinyos-2.0wg at Mail.Millennium.Berkeley.EDU
> https://mail.millennium.berkeley.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tinyos-2.0wg
>