[Tinyos-2.0wg] Re: beta2

[Vlado Handziski]

On 7/6/06, Philip Levis <pal at cs.stanford.edu> wrote:
>
> On Jul 5, 2006, at 4:10 PM, David Gay wrote:
>
> > On 7/5/06, Philip Levis <pal at cs.stanford.edu> wrote:
> >> On Wed, 2006-07-05 at 15:16, Kristin Wright wrote:
> >> > I forgot to mention: I have yet to do the janitorial work on the
> >> > branch, but I'm doing it now (check in my slightly
> >> modifications, tag
> >> > the release, tagging the tools release so we can figure out what
> >> > tinyos-tools 1.2.2 came from).
> >>
> >> It looks like the nesC 1.2.7 RPM still depends on /usr/bin/guile.
> >>
> >> The TinyOS RPM is also still requiring perl(Graphviz).
> >>
> >> Is there any way to remove these?
> >
> > Ok. The perl(GraphViz) requirement is correct. It's due to:
> > ./apps/tests/TestTreeRouting/parse_tree.pl:# Requires the installation
> > of the GraphViz perl module (just do >cpan install GraphViz)
> > ./apps/tests/TestTreeRouting/parse_tree.pl:use GraphViz;
> > ./apps/tests/TestTreeRouting/parse_tree.pl:$g = GraphViz->new();
> >
> > so remove parse_tree.pl if you don't want the requirement. Or do
> > Vlado's suggested fix if you just want to remove it from the
> > requirements (i.e., TestTreeRouting will require the perl GraphViz
> > module - should be documented in its README).
>
> OK. It looks like a few non-critical testing apps crept through. I've
> added a few more prunings to tinyos.files.
>
> If the nesc RPM is going to require guile, then we need to point
> people to place to get it, or tell them it's OK to install with --
> nodeps. The latter seems preferable, but then why do we have it in
> the first place?
>
>
David sent out a source tarball that does not have the dependency. We only
need to repackage.

Vlado
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mail.millennium.berkeley.edu/pipermail/tinyos-2.0wg/attachments/20060706/5080b137/attachment-0001.html