[Tinyos Core WG] Re: AdcConfigure and struct return

[David Gay]

On 10/5/06, Jan Hauer <jan.hauer at gmail.com> wrote:
> Great! Looking at the notes there is only one (small) issue left for
> TEP 101: parameterized types do not solve the problem of multiple
> different ADCs concerning the naming of the HIL components. The
> proposed solution was to prefix the respective component names
> (AdcRead[Now|Stream]ClientC) with the chip name. Alternatively we can
> ignore multiple ADCs in this TEP. I prefer the first option (but would
> also agree to the second). Comments? I'll update the TEP and check in
> the code as soon as we made the decision.

I think the consensus on the telecon was to ignore multiple ADCs. Not
much opinion myself...

David