[Tinyos Core WG] TestSerial on telosB

[Joe Polastre]

Jars should be part of releases, not code branches.

-Joe

On 10/20/06, Phil Buonadonna <pbuonadonna at archrock.com> wrote:
> > Why are we keeping the .jar in CVS? This just complicates
> > things. A better option is to have the .jar created during
> > the RPM building step.
> >
> I disagree.  It make things a lot easier for those doing platform devel.
> that don't want to worry about the java cruft. The tests should be
> self-contained.... including the java jar.  That's what it's there for.
>
> pb
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Vlado Handziski [mailto:vlado.handziski at gmail.com]
> > Sent: Friday, October 20, 2006 12:14 AM
> > To: Philip Levis
> > Cc: Phil Buonadonna; TinyOS Core WG
> > Subject: Re: [Tinyos Core WG] TestSerial on telosB
> >
> > On 10/20/06, Philip Levis <pal at cs.stanford.edu> wrote:
> >
> >       On Oct 19, 2006, at 6:18 PM, Phil Buonadonna wrote:
> >
> >       > I'm trying to get the new serial stuff running on the
> > Intel Mote 2..
> >       >
> >       > At this point, I can't even get it running on the telos.  Does
> >       > anyone have
> >       > any recent experience with this?
> >       >
> >       > Output of the serial forwarder when running the
> > TestSerial suite is
> >       > below.
> >       > The console keeps reporting: ignoring unknown packet
> > type.  Is this
> >       > expected?
> >
> >       The current tinyos.jar is inconsistent with the current
> > serial code.
> >       You need to blow away tinyos.jar, make clean in java,
> > and then make
> >       tinyos.jar.
> >
> >
> >
> > Why are we keeping the .jar in CVS? This just complicates
> > things. A better option is to have the .jar created during
> > the RPM building step.
> >
> > Vlado
> >
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> Tinyos-2.0wg mailing list
> Tinyos-2.0wg at Mail.Millennium.Berkeley.EDU
> https://mail.millennium.berkeley.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tinyos-2.0wg
>