[Tinyos Core WG] RE: Small gotcha in UartStream interface

[Jonathan Hui]

I agree as well. Accessors should be there too.

-- 
Jonathan W. Hui
jwhui at cs.berkeley.edu
http://www.cs.berkeley.edu/~jwhui/

On 10/20/06, Philip Levis <pal at cs.stanford.edu> wrote:
> On Oct 20, 2006, at 3:47 PM, Phil Buonadonna wrote:
>
> > There's yet another issue:
> >
> > What is the *default* state of the ReceiveInterrupt for the purpose of
> > signalling the receivedByte event?  Enabled or Disabled?
> >
> > The code that presently exists assumes it's *enabled*?  Is this
> > intentional?
> > The interface docs should reflect this if so.
>
> Agreed. I think the default state should be disabled, personally.
>
> Phil
> _______________________________________________
> Tinyos-2.0wg mailing list
> Tinyos-2.0wg at Mail.Millennium.Berkeley.EDU
> https://mail.millennium.berkeley.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tinyos-2.0wg
>