[Tinyos Core WG] micaz report

[Vlado Handziski]

On 10/31/06, David Gay <dgay42 at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On 10/30/06, Philip Levis <pal at cs.stanford.edu> wrote:
> > Everything but storage seems to be A-OK. Detailed report:
> >
> > BaseStation: passed
> > BaseStationCC2420: passed
> > Blink:  passed
> > Null: passed
> > Oscilloscope: passed
> > Powerup: passed
> > RadioCountToLeds: passed
> > RadioSenseToLeds: passed
> > tests/storage: (Tests performed on different nodes and in various
> > orders)
> >   o Block: passed 200, 300, failed 400
> >   o CircularLog: passed 300, failed 400, 800, 700, 600 (seems to fail
> > on erase)
> >   o Log: passed 300, 700
> >   o Config: failed 100, 200, 300, 800
>
> What does this mean exactly? The only obvious one to me is that those
> are block ids. But, for instance, Block doesn't understand a node id
> of 400 (legal values based on the README are 0-99, 200-299, 300-399).
> Note that the test selection is the hundred's digit, and the seed is
> the ten's and unit's.
>
>
While we are discussing storage, I wanted to propose that we modify the
readme to use number index naming for the LEDs to make it more platform
independent. I mentioned this in the log from the tests I did on eyesIFX,
but it went below the radar.

Vlado
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mail.millennium.berkeley.edu/pipermail/tinyos-2.0wg/attachments/20061031/7454c27b/attachment.html