[Tinyos-2.0wg] TEP 103

[Philip Levis]

On Sep 8, 2006, at 6:29 PM, Jonathan Hui wrote:

> Yeah, TEP103 is broken in that sense. But the answer is like we do
> with any other chip: Prepend the chip name to the component names.
>

Yeah; it doesn't mean that 103 won't work (at some point the global  
name goes to a single chip). But it does mean that a chip MUST have a  
chip-specific name for its abstraction.

> As for volume management, we could add a "chip=XXX" attribute to the
> "volume_table" tag where XXX is tos/chips/XXX.

That would work. Another part of this is perhaps modifying chip  
implementations so that you can pass names in; otherwise, if you have  
two of the same chip, you're in trouble.

Phil