[Tinyos Core WG] ResourceController interface
Philip Levis
pal at cs.stanford.edu
Fri Feb 2 12:24:21 PST 2007
On Feb 2, 2007, at 11:02 AM, Kevin Klues wrote:
> Yes, it is only a name change, but one of the major confusions with
> the original version of TEP 108 was with the ResourceController
> interface and what its intended purpose was. Matt (the shepard)
> suggested the name change would probably make it more clear, and I
> agreed with him. As I'm searching back through my sent emails it
> seems that I never sent anything to the mailing list discussing the
> change. I know that I intended to, but I was doing the revisions
> while on vacation and I guess it somehow slipped my mind. Since I
> never heard anything back (from the email that I apparently never
> sent :) I assumed that noone had any problems with it. It was an
> oversight on my part that 103 referenced ResourceController and
> this really should have been taken care of before finalizing 108. I
> apologize for that, but the question is what should be done now....
>
> I personally think the name change is an appropriate one and that
> it should now be called ResourceDefaultOwner. Both 103 and 108
> have been finalized though, so I'm not really sure what the
> appropriate course of action is. Modifying 108 to point out that
> the interface 'used' to be called ResourceController seems like a
> bigger change than simply changing the single reference to this
> interface in TEP 103. Both TEPs have been officially finalized
> though, so theoretically, neither of them should really be changed.
>
I'd suggest an Informational TEP that describes the change. Because
it's Informational, it doesn't necessarily have to go through the
whole rigamarole that Documentary ones do.
Phil
More information about the Tinyos-2.0wg
mailing list