On Sep 26, 2007, at 11:32 PM, David Gay wrote: > Is it really worth having both seededCrc16 and crc16, just to avoid > having to pass a 0 argument in some cases? (i.e., why not just have > seededCrc16, and call it crc16?) I think so. If seeded were the common case, I would think otherwise. Keep the common case simple. Phil