[Tinyos Core WG] Testing results

[Kevin Klues]

And Konrad.  It seems that the problems you were encountering with the
thread compilations has to do with not having the latest tools from
tinyos-2.x/tools installed (at least for telosb).  For shimmer, you
would have to add the shimmer platform to the list at the bottom of
threads.extra to get it to compile.

Kevin

On Tue, Jul 1, 2008 at 11:38 PM, Kevin Klues <klueska at gmail.com> wrote:
> So installing with an update of the make directory to HEAD fixes the
> problem.  I was installing from the rc_2 tag that we were supposed to
> be testing from.....
>
> I'll rerun the tests, but it might not be before the meeting in the
> morning.....  Should I jsut wait since it seems we will be needing an
> rc_3 tag anyway now?
>
> Kevin
>
> On Tue, Jul 1, 2008 at 7:02 PM, Konrad Lorincz <konrad at eecs.harvard.edu> wrote:
>> I followed the instructions from
>> http://www.cs.utah.edu/~coop/safetinyos/install/
>> (using CVS head -- no debian packages) and I can compile and run safe apps
>> under both telosb and shimmer.
>>
>> -Konrad
>>
>> Philip Levis wrote:
>>>
>>> On Jul 1, 2008, at 6:49 PM, Kevin Klues wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>> None of the telosb apps I compile with 'safe' are working at runtime.
>>>> I am using all the compilers / tools in the debian repo.  You said
>>>> things were tested at least for BaseStation, Null, Blink, etc., but
>>>> they are still failing for me.  Am I missing something?
>>>>
>>>
>>> Are the code/RAM numbers funny? I was running into this for the  micaz.
>>> David Gay took a look. I needed to update to the head on  support/make.
>>>
>>> Phil
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Tinyos-2.0wg mailing list
>>> Tinyos-2.0wg at millennium.berkeley.edu
>>> https://www.millennium.berkeley.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tinyos-2.0wg
>>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
> --
> ~Kevin
>



-- 
~Kevin