[Tinyos Core WG] Meeting: 5/28 (another full agenda)

[Janos Sallai]

Kevin,
 
Once it's checked in, I will do the testing on the iris.
 
Janos

________________________________

From: tinyos-2.0wg-bounces at millennium.berkeley.edu on behalf of Kevin Klues
Sent: Tue 6/10/2008 6:25 PM
To: Miklos Maroti
Cc: TinyOS Core WG; Philip Levis
Subject: Re: [Tinyos Core WG] Meeting: 5/28 (another full agenda)



OK, I did the necessary changes, and everything compiles fine.  I
don't have any iris's to test with though, so once things are checked
in, someone with iris's will ahve to verify that all the test apps
compile and run.

Kevin

On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 3:14 PM, Kevin Klues <klueska at gmail.com> wrote:
> Apps that don't use the timers seem to compile fine.  It seems that
> the timer registers are named differently on the atm1281 as on the
> atm128.  I see the components defined for these defined in
> tos/chips/atm1281 though, and adding threading support to them should
> be trivial (just put the postamble at the bottom of the handlers).
> I'll do this in the next few hours and post back.
>
> Kevin
>
> On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 2:56 PM, Miklos Maroti <mmaroti at math.u-szeged.hu> wrote:
>> Hi Kevin,
>>
>> On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 11:51 PM, Kevin Klues <klueska at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> I've verified that adding threading support and allowing one to do a
>>> 'make telosb threads' does not increase any ROM or RAM usage on
>>> telosb, mica2, and micaz platforms when doing a normal 'make telosb',
>>> etc -- apps compiled without the 'threads' target remain unchanged.
>>
>> Does it work for IRIS (atmega1281) automatically? Please do a compile for that.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Miklos
>>
>
>
>
> --
> ~Kevin
>



--
~Kevin
_______________________________________________
Tinyos-2.0wg mailing list
Tinyos-2.0wg at millennium.berkeley.edu
https://www.millennium.berkeley.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tinyos-2.0wg