[Tinyos-alliance] [Tinyos-devel] TinyOS Website

[Kristin Wright]

Yes, there does need to be more upkeep. I update the working groups
minutes monthly (I'm due for an update -- I know) and I check the
tinyos.net stories at most 2X per week.

It would be bested if each  group can maintain their own group
website. My thought was to have a link to a private page that the
group chair can update. This standard page would remain standard but
link to another page. This was the model of the original ietf working
group page Phil L. sent to use as a model. Some groups did do this.

I agree that the scoop software should be replaced with better
community-site software. Maybe someone has studied these and can make
a recommendation.

-kw

On 3/12/06, Joe Polastre <joe at polastre.com> wrote:
> (cc: TinyOS-alliance as I'm not sure where this message should go)
>
> Is anyone in charge of the TinyOS website now that Kristin has moved
> on to Arched Rock.  The TinyOS release descriptions are stuck back at
> TinyOS 1.11, and there's a couple of scoop stories (including mine)
> sitting in the pending section.  The working group pages are fairly
> out of date (notes way out of date, teps not updated) with respect to
> the progress that each working group has made (it seems like each
> group should maintain its own website, right?)
>
> In general, there's the potential for the website to be really useful,
> but there is no structure in place for community members to maintain
> its value.
>
> Also, btw, I think it is time for scoop to go.  It hasn't really
> worked for us at all.
>
> -Joe
>
> _______________________________________________
> Tinyos-devel mailing list
> Tinyos-devel at Millennium.Berkeley.EDU
> https://mail.millennium.berkeley.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tinyos-devel
>