[Tinyos-alliance] WG bridge for 4/18: 415-692-0828 x8604 pin: 3987#

[David E. Culler]

I think that it makes sense for a project, a center, or a university to 
become a member or contributing member.  Why should we make the faculty 
member choose which level of his/her institution should be the joining 
entity.

Philippe Bonnet wrote:

>Dear all,
>
>I will not be able to participate at the teleconference again tonight.
>A question though related to corporate membership and funding:
>
>Would a project be allowed to be a contributing corporate member? It
>seems to me that projects might be able to contribute to the alliance
>either via targeted contribution (helping out with the
>logistics/funding of TTX), or simply cash. There might be some
>regulation problems but my guess is that EU projects in particular are
>eager to participate in any form of standardization activities.
>
>Jack mentions unwanted or prohibited membership in the funding
>section.  Does this refer to some form of regulations that would
>prevent a corporation from becoming a contributing member in the
>alliance or do we want to have criterias for who can or cannot become
>a contributing corporate member?
>
>Best regards,
>Philippe.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>On 4/18/06, David E. Culler <culler at eecs.berkeley.edu> wrote:
>  
>
>>Time: 11:00 pacific time
>>
>>Dial 415-692-0828 (the main Arch Rock number), request extension 8604
>>then pin 3987#
>>
>>Agenda
>>
>>Several folks said that they have not been engaging, because they didn't
>>have much to add on the IP front.  We've made good progress on that.
>>I'll collate what we have so far into TEP format before the call.
>>
>>This meeting will focus on the community building, marketing, fee
>>structure, and formational efforts.
>>
>>
>>_______________________________________________
>>Tinyos-alliance mailing list
>>Tinyos-alliance at millennium.berkeley.edu
>>https://mail.millennium.berkeley.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tinyos-alliance
>>
>>
>>    
>>