[Tinyos-alliance] Steering com input

[Ramesh Govindan]

> 
> Do you feel that the SC should review each TEP? On one hand, the 2.x WG

Not strongly enough yet to insist that we write it that way ;-). If the 
community has an informal process that seems to be working, let's keep it 
that way.

> has started doing it this way, on the other, that by no means suggests
> that it's the right way! You have a lot more experience with these sorts
> of efforts (e.g., the IETF) than most members of the 2.x WG.
> 

The IESG review is indeed required of all RFCs. The advantage is that 
there is at least one designated person (one who is not part of the WG) 
who is in charge of reviewing each RFC produced by a WG. We can always 
switch to this model later if we find ours not working.

> I think you make a good corollary point: that whatever policy the
> Alliance WG decides on should be made a bit more explicit, with some of
> the reasoning explained.
> 
> Phil
> 
> 
> 

-- 
Ramesh
http://cs.usc.edu/~ramesh/