[Tinyos-alliance] Steering com input

Philip Levis pal at cs.stanford.edu
Thu Apr 27 15:32:01 PDT 2006


On Wed, 2006-04-26 at 13:17 -0700, Ramesh Govindan wrote:

> The SC is also responsible for reviewing and approving all TEPs. WGs
> submit TEPs to the SC for review. The SC should appoint one
> contributing Alliance member not affiliated with the corresponding WG
> to review the TEP. This reviewer, who may or may not be a member of
> the SC, may solicit comments from the community at large, but must
> also thoroughly review the submitted TEP. WGs must address any
> issues/questions brought up either by the reviewer or by other
> community members. Once the reviewer approves the revisions, he/she
> presents the TEP to the SC for approval by rough consensus. Finally,
> TEPs that affect the organizational structure of the Alliance must
> also be approved by the Board.


I like this text a lot. It encompasses the approach we're taking now
while cleanly incorporating the SC and clearly stating what the
expectations are.

Phil



More information about the Tinyos-alliance mailing list