[Tinyos-alliance] below Quorum

[David Gay]

On 11/7/06, Matt Welsh <mdw at eecs.harvard.edu> wrote:
> In order for code to be part of the main tree, it should be
> associated with a finalized TEP. For example, the Timer subsystem or
> the networking subsystem in the main tree should be the
> implementation related to a TEP that has been finalized (that is,
> gone through all of the cycles of revision, community review, and
> shepherding).

One obvious issue: do we want every piece of code in the main tree to
be associated with a TEP? I'm thinking in particular of platform
specific decisions (e.g., built-in sensors) which may not warrant a
TEP, but there's probably other cases (applications spring to mind if
nothing else ;-)). The obvious thing here would be to look through the
current tree and consider for each file:
- is it associated w/ a TEP?
- if not, why not? (some set of categories would be useful...)

David