[Tinyos-alliance] Fixing the scheduling of our meetings
dculler
dculler at archrock.com
Tue Apr 3 10:36:01 PDT 2007
Today, I think the only thing that makes sense is to stick to the 11:00
slot. Phil won't be able to make it, but we'll catch up with him.
_____
From: Adam Wolisz [mailto:awo at ieee.org]
Sent: Tuesday, April 03, 2007 10:33 AM
To: dculler at archrock.com
Subject: Re: [Tinyos-alliance] Fixing the scheduling of our meetings
I could - in general,
What about today? Do we have one?
Adam
dculler wrote:
Folks,
It looks like we need to attend more seriously to the issue of scheduling
our meetings. Matt started a round of this, but it did not converge. Now
that the term has started, both Matt and Phil have conflicts at 11.
Philippe was not able to make 11, as it conflicted with parenting duties.
Neither time works for Kang, it would have to be evening. Ralph has not
shown up in a long while, but I don't think that is a regular conflict.
So, I'd like to try first with a concrete option. Return the meeting to 10
am tuesday. Can people make that work?
D.
_____
_______________________________________________
Tinyos-alliance mailing list
Tinyos-alliance at millennium.berkeley.edu
https://mail.millennium.berkeley.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tinyos-allianc
e
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mail.millennium.berkeley.edu/pipermail/tinyos-alliance/attachments/20070403/a832c4c4/attachment.htm
More information about the Tinyos-alliance
mailing list