[Tinyos-devel] Proposed change to the serial stack in TinyOS 2
Philip Levis
pal at cs.stanford.edu
Wed Dec 20 11:10:01 PST 2006
On Dec 15, 2006, at 2:22 PM, Michael Newman wrote:
> There are two parts of power management. It is fine for the user of a
> component to be required to express a desire to use it by having
> to do an
> Init at system startup, and then a START (on) to use it and a STOP
> (off)
> when done. Internal to the driver the component itself turns the
> required
> hardware on and off etc. It is this internal housekeeping that
> should be
> hidden from the user especially when there are required delays. If
> a flush
> is required after the user says stop before powering down the
> hardware then
> that flush is part of the component and should be part of the STOP
> hiding
> the need from the component user. I see no reason to expose the
> flush, the
> higher layers do not need to know. (I agree that is should not be
> async or
> wait during an async function.)
>
But what if a flush isn't always needed? That's the basic question.
If all possible uses of the UART want the flush, then it makes sense
to include it as part of the on/off logic. It's easy to make an
"always flushes before off" layer on top of one that doesn't, while
the opposite direction is not.
Phil
More information about the Tinyos-devel
mailing list