[Tinyos-devel] Re: from longer CTP/LQI experiments

[Omprakash Gnawali]

On Dec 24, 2007 5:56 PM, Jeongyeup Paek <jpaek at usc.edu> wrote:
>
>
> > The T2 MLQI is a direct port from 1.x. So the forwarding engine policy
> > should be no different.
>
> Yes. The 90+% experience we had was with 'modified t1 MLQI'
> with identical route selection engine, but modified forwarding engine.
> The point that I wanted to make was that the parent selection
> capability of MLQI could have been underestimated due to not-so-nice
> forwarding, and we've seen it do better.

In the course of protocol comparison, even with the stock lqi, we have
sometimes seen 90+% delivery ratio. But we did not find this
performance consistent. CTP seems more consistent based on experiments
under variety of conditions.

- om_p