[Tinyos-devel] Re: Python SDK
Philip Levis
pal at cs.stanford.edu
Tue Jul 3 14:35:38 PDT 2007
On Jul 3, 2007, at 2:33 PM, Vlado Handziski wrote:
> If we aim for 2.1, we should first fix MIG because the code that is
> currently generated is sometimes "unpythonic". Better support for
> message encapsulation/decapsulation is also very important. I am
> not sure how far these issues are addressed in the code from Matt,
> but they were the main reason why we did not submit to the core our
> serial forwarder implementation based on twisted python. We use
> internal workarounds for the above problems, and pushing them into
> the core would have required rewriting major parts of the TOSSIM
> python support.
Can you be more specific?
> Another "nice to have" item would be to update the rpc and the nesc
> modules from Kamin to handle the platform independent message
> structures. This will give us a well rounded, powerful SDK.
Agreed. But let's not make this a blocking item for progress on more
contained (and pressing) issues.
Phil
More information about the Tinyos-devel
mailing list