[Tinyos-devel] Re: [Tinyos-help] Question about printf

[Philip Levis]

On Sep 21, 2007, at 8:25 PM, Kevin Klues wrote:

> I don't seen anything in 'man 3 printf' that implies that it has to be
> a blocking operation.  In fact the manual shouldn't imply this.
> printf is part of the standard C library, not affiliated with any
> particular operating system.

Right -- the printf semantics have more to do with the associated  
file stream (printf is really just a call to fprintf) than with  
printf itself. In the case of printf, the file stream is stdout.

>
> To implement printf() functionality for any mcu that has a libc (such
> as msp430-libc or avr-libc) you just have to fill in the body of the
> 'putchar' function declared in "stdio.h".  This is exactly what the
> PrintfP component in tos/lib/printf does.  No magic..... it just
> collects the bytes coming in via calls to putchar, packs them into
> TInyOS serial messages, and sends them out over the USART.

Right -- so look at how putchar is typically implemented. The example  
from avr-gcc's stdio.h goes like this:

     static int
     uart_putchar(char c, FILE *stream)
     {

       if (c == '\n')
         uart_putchar('\r', stream);
       loop_until_bit_is_set(UCSRA, UDRE);
       UDR = c;
       return 0;
     }

     int
     main(void)
     {
       init_uart();
       stdout = &mystdout;
       printf("Hello, world!\n");

       return 0;
     }


> It should be left up to whatever operating system that implements it
> to define the semantics.

Great: I'd like to define a printf semantics that crashes the computer.

Look -- to reiterate my last mail, I agree that this function is  
useful, and it should be available. I'm just saying that, because it  
does differ significantly from what one might expect from printf,  
maybe it should be named differently. E.g.:

void test() {
   uint16_t i;
   for (i = 0; i < 20480; i++) {
     printf("\n");
   }
}

If you can find a reasonable implementation of printf besides yours  
that does not print out 20480 newlines, then my concern is totally  
unfounded and wrong.

Phil