[Tinyos-devel] Re: [net2-wg] fwdbusy bug in LqiForwardingEngineP.nc

Philip Levis pal at cs.stanford.edu
Tue Feb 12 15:58:15 PST 2008


On Feb 12, 2008, at 2:40 PM, Omprakash Gnawali wrote:

> I see two problems with fwdbusy variable:
>
> 1. In static void forward(message_t* msg), if the send call fails,
> fwdbusy is set to TRUE but it can never be set to FALSE again. I think
> we should set it to TRUE only if the send call returns a success. The
> forward function was introduction in revision 1.2.
>
> 2. event void SubSend.sendDone(message_t* msg, error_t success), if we
> haven't exhausted all the retries, we return regardless of the outcome
> of send. If the send call fails, we won't get a chance to set fwdbusy
> to FALSE. The return statement was added in version 1.4.
>
> It will be great if Phil, as an author, could take a look at these  
> issues.
>

What is causing the send call to fail? Is the problem here that LQI  
is assuming the AM layer is on? If the LQI implementation is correct,  
then it should not be calling Send.send when there is already a send  
pending.

Phil


More information about the Tinyos-devel mailing list