[Tinyos-devel] two zigbee implementations
Omprakash Gnawali
gnawali at usc.edu
Mon Jul 14 04:57:56 PDT 2008
On Fri, Jul 11, 2008 at 6:18 PM, Philip Levis <pal at cs.stanford.edu> wrote:
>
> On Jul 11, 2008, at 9:44 AM, David E. Culler wrote:
>
>> So, volunteers permitting, I would most like to see option 1. Core
>> should remain Core. These other WGs should push Core to enable them.
>>
>>
>> Omprakash Gnawali wrote:
>>>
>>> Enumerating the options:
>>>
>>> 1. 15.4 WG. Zigbee WG.
>
> I agree in theory -- the only drawback to this breakdown is whether there's
> enough critical mass for working groups to form around the topics. This
> historically is why tasks like 15.4 and zigbee have fallen under existing
> WGs (core and net2, respectively); doing so gave the developer (each had a
> single developer) a group of other folks working on somewhat similar
> problems with whom they could talk and collaborate. That being said, now
> that WGs have moved their discussions to -devel, this might be much less of
> an issue than it once was.
>
TUB and Porto ok with option 1?
- om_p
More information about the Tinyos-devel
mailing list