[Tinyos-devel] two zigbee implementations
Andreas Köpke
koepke at tkn.tu-berlin.de
Mon Jul 14 06:01:09 PDT 2008
Am Montag, den 14.07.2008, 04:57 -0700 schrieb Omprakash Gnawali:
> On Fri, Jul 11, 2008 at 6:18 PM, Philip Levis <pal at cs.stanford.edu> wrote:
> >
> > On Jul 11, 2008, at 9:44 AM, David E. Culler wrote:
> >
> >> So, volunteers permitting, I would most like to see option 1. Core
> >> should remain Core. These other WGs should push Core to enable them.
> >>
> >>
> >> Omprakash Gnawali wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Enumerating the options:
> >>>
> >>> 1. 15.4 WG. Zigbee WG.
> >
> > I agree in theory -- the only drawback to this breakdown is whether there's
> > enough critical mass for working groups to form around the topics. This
> > historically is why tasks like 15.4 and zigbee have fallen under existing
> > WGs (core and net2, respectively); doing so gave the developer (each had a
> > single developer) a group of other folks working on somewhat similar
> > problems with whom they could talk and collaborate. That being said, now
> > that WGs have moved their discussions to -devel, this might be much less of
> > an issue than it once was.
> >
>
>
> TUB and Porto ok with option 1?
>
> - om_p
Sorry, our main developer is currently on vacation, I guess it makes
little sense to reach an agreement before he returns and had a chance to
say something on this topic.
Best, Andreas Köpke
More information about the Tinyos-devel
mailing list