[Tinyos-devel] parameterization of UartStream

Vlado Handziski handzisk at tkn.tu-berlin.de
Mon May 5 12:58:40 PDT 2008


You can post them here, or you can open a report on SF and attach it there.
But I guess taking the shortcut is fine.

Vlado

On Mon, May 5, 2008 at 9:34 PM, Eric Decker <cire831 at gmail.com> wrote:

> What is strange is the Resource and ResourceConfig are parameterized which
> gives the impression
> that the resource is arbritrated but UartStream and UartByte aren't.  But
> not a big deal the fix
> is pretty simple.  I coded up the parameterization of UartStream and
> UartByte for the msp430.
>
> Should I post them here for review or who should I send them to?
>
> eric
>
>
> On Mon, May 5, 2008 at 9:26 AM, Vlado Handziski <handzisk at tkn.tu-berlin.de>
> wrote:
>
>> Clients can also live with a non-parametrized functional interface
>> (UartStream in this case) by making sure to ignore events if he they are not
>> the current owner of the resource. But I agree that in this case, to
>> minimize impact on existing client code, the best option would be to
>> parametrize UartStream. This was probably not done in the first place by
>> Jonathan because originally the serial stack was sitting on top of UartByte
>> and Stream was added later, but before the parametrized SpiPacket.
>>
>> Vlado
>>
>> On Sat, May 3, 2008 at 3:46 PM, Kevin Klues <klueska at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> I think this sounds right.  Any interface which signals events back
>>> should be parameterized, while interfaces that only provide commands
>>> don't necessarily have to be because these commands are only called
>>> (presumably) by the current owner of the resource.  I assume this was
>>> the same reasoning used for SpiPacket interface as it is parameterized
>>> within an underlying Msp430SpiDma0P and then exported on a client by
>>> client basis through the Msp430Spi0C component.
>>>
>>> I guess this never came up as an issue before because not that many
>>> people use the UART interfaces on current platforms as they do the SPI
>>> interfaces.
>>>
>>> Kevin
>>>
>>> On Sat, May 3, 2008 at 12:23 AM, Eric Decker <cire831 at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> > I've run into a problem with how the uart is wired on the msp430.
>>> >
>>> > On the device we are building we have a serial multiplexer attached
>>> outboard
>>> > of UART1 on the msp430.
>>> > This multiplexer switches between the serial line going to the PC and a
>>> GPS
>>> > unit.  Access to the UART
>>> >  is controlled by a Resource Arbiter and works well.
>>> >
>>> > However, examining MSP430Uart1C revels that while Resource and
>>> > ResourceConfigure are paramertized
>>> > UartStream isn't.  Yet UartStream is what wires 3 events from the
>>> interrupt
>>> > system when tx and rx
>>> >  events have occured.
>>> >
>>> > What I've observed is the GPS s/w will arbritrate for the UART and will
>>> get
>>> > the grant.  The GPS
>>> > starts to send data and the interrupt system will hand the received
>>> byte to
>>> > the GPS code via the
>>> >  event as it should.  The received byte will also be handed to
>>> > HdlcTranslateC which has been
>>> > wired in to UartStream via PlatformSerialC to handle packets being
>>> received
>>> > from the PC.  This
>>> > is because of fan-out from the non-parameterized interface.
>>> >
>>> > I beleive the solution is to parameterize UartStream so the events are
>>> > delivered to the proper
>>> > owner of the interface.  I've coded up a fix for the MSP430 (my
>>> platform and
>>> > the telosb).  Should
>>> > I post the diffs here?
>>> >
>>> > Thoughts?
>>> >
>>> > eric
>>> > Eric B. Decker
>>> > research associate
>>> > Autonomous Systems Lab
>>> > Baskin School of Engineering
>>> > UCSC
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > _______________________________________________
>>> >  Tinyos-devel mailing list
>>> >  Tinyos-devel at millennium.berkeley.edu
>>> >
>>> https://www.millennium.berkeley.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tinyos-devel
>>> >
>>> >
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> ~Kevin
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Tinyos-devel mailing list
>>> Tinyos-devel at millennium.berkeley.edu
>>> https://www.millennium.berkeley.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tinyos-devel
>>>
>>
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: https://www.millennium.berkeley.edu/pipermail/tinyos-devel/attachments/20080505/822e0965/attachment.htm 


More information about the Tinyos-devel mailing list