[Tinyos-devel] [Tinyos Core WG] TEP105: LowPowerListening DutyCycles
Philip Levis
pal at cs.stanford.edu
Mon May 19 10:32:28 PDT 2008
On May 19, 2008, at 10:12 AM, Andreas Koepke wrote:
> Should we go ahead and define such an interface?
The issue here is distinguishing failure cases. I'm leery of defining
and interface where FAIL means "not acked," because it does not let
the higher layer distinguish "I am broken" from "sure, retry." E.g.,
CTP would respond very different, with respect to retries and its link
estimation, between the lower stack failing and a packet not being
acked.
Phil
More information about the Tinyos-devel
mailing list