[Tinyos-devel] [Tinyos Core WG] TEP105: LowPowerListening DutyCycles

Philip Levis pal at cs.stanford.edu
Mon May 19 10:32:28 PDT 2008


On May 19, 2008, at 10:12 AM, Andreas Koepke wrote:

> Should we go ahead and define such an interface?

The issue here is distinguishing failure cases. I'm leery of defining  
and interface where FAIL means "not acked," because it does not let  
the higher layer distinguish "I am broken" from "sure, retry." E.g.,  
CTP would respond very different, with respect to retries and its link  
estimation, between the lower stack failing and a packet not being  
acked.

Phil


More information about the Tinyos-devel mailing list