[Tinyos-devel] [Tinyos Core WG] TEP105: LowPowerListeningDutyCycles

[Andreas Koepke]

David Moss:
> ENOACK  :)

Ok ;-)

> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: tinyos-devel-bounces at millennium.berkeley.edu
> [mailto:tinyos-devel-bounces at millennium.berkeley.edu] On Behalf Of Philip
> Levis
> Sent: Monday, May 19, 2008 10:32 AM
> To: Andreas Koepke
> Cc: tinyos-devel at millennium.berkeley.edu
> Subject: Re: [Tinyos-devel] [Tinyos Core WG] TEP105:
> LowPowerListeningDutyCycles
> 
> 
> On May 19, 2008, at 10:12 AM, Andreas Koepke wrote:
> 
>> Should we go ahead and define such an interface?
> 
> The issue here is distinguishing failure cases. I'm leery of defining  
> and interface where FAIL means "not acked," because it does not let  
> the higher layer distinguish "I am broken" from "sure, retry." E.g.,  
> CTP would respond very different, with respect to retries and its link  
> estimation, between the lower stack failing and a packet not being  
> acked.
> 
> Phil
> _______________________________________________
> Tinyos-devel mailing list
> Tinyos-devel at millennium.berkeley.edu
> https://www.millennium.berkeley.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tinyos-devel
> 
>