On May 20, 2008, at 1:35 PM, Kevin Klues wrote: > I like ENORESOURCE, and I think it should be added. Let's stick with ENOMEM; it's more specific than ENORESOURCE, and has a clear solution. ENORESOURCE could be almost anything, and I fear that it might end up being overloaded (e.g., can't acquire a DMA channel *and* out of memory). Phil