[Tinyos-devel] Fwd: SendNotifier for Iris.
David Moss
dmm at rincon.com
Mon Nov 17 14:09:25 PST 2008
Should all applications and protocols use this pattern? Only if it works
for most people... all I'm saying is it works exceptionally well for what
I'm trying to do in my deployments.
If there's a better way to have this much control over outbound messages, I
think we'd all be open to suggestions. It also seems like if Ignacio really
wants this interface built in, it's simple enough to implement locally
without affecting the rest of the world.
-David
-----Original Message-----
From: gnawali at gmail.com [mailto:gnawali at gmail.com] On Behalf Of Omprakash
Gnawali
Sent: Monday, November 17, 2008 1:37 PM
To: David Moss
Cc: Miklos Maroti; Philip Levis; TinyOS Development
Subject: Re: [Tinyos-devel] Fwd: SendNotifier for Iris.
On Mon, Nov 17, 2008 at 11:22 AM, David Moss <dmm at rincon.com> wrote:
> My opinion may be a bit partial... but my app layer keeps a registry of AM
> types and corresponding radios those types should be sent through, and
uses
> the SendNotifier interface to configure those outbound messages. It's
kind
> of like dropping in a plug-in to give the system a new personality so you
> don't have to edit generic libraries that should remain unmodified.
>
Sure but Ignacio did not implement CTP and he wants to be able to
configure the messages generated by CTP. Are you saying all the
applications and protocols should use the pattern you mention? If that
is the case, it seems like that is an argument for pushing this
functionality down to the generic libraries.
- om_p
More information about the Tinyos-devel
mailing list