[Tinyos-devel] SimpleArbiterP bug

Philip Levis pal at cs.stanford.edu
Wed Oct 15 17:11:05 PDT 2008


On Oct 15, 2008, at 11:03 AM, Kevin Klues wrote:

> Nevermind, I see how your code works.  I'll look into pushing it into
> the tree this way in the next couple of days if no one responds saying
> they require the existing semantics.

Why is there a ResourceRequested interface? Why would a client ever  
care? The idea that a client might sit on the lock when it's unused  
and it could release it is broken in the first place; this is the role  
of a DefaultOwner.

Phil


More information about the Tinyos-devel mailing list