[Tinyos-devel] SimpleArbiterP bug
Philip Levis
pal at cs.stanford.edu
Wed Oct 15 17:11:05 PDT 2008
On Oct 15, 2008, at 11:03 AM, Kevin Klues wrote:
> Nevermind, I see how your code works. I'll look into pushing it into
> the tree this way in the next couple of days if no one responds saying
> they require the existing semantics.
Why is there a ResourceRequested interface? Why would a client ever
care? The idea that a client might sit on the lock when it's unused
and it could release it is broken in the first place; this is the role
of a DefaultOwner.
Phil
More information about the Tinyos-devel
mailing list