[Tinyos-devel] protocols and ActiveMessageAddress.changed

Eric Decker cire831 at gmail.com
Sat Mar 28 00:54:37 PDT 2009


On Fri, Mar 27, 2009 at 8:38 PM, Omprakash Gnawali <gnawali at usc.edu> wrote:

> Should protocols such as CTP continue to work if the am address is changed?
>
> What are the minimum conditions/events under which protocols should just
> work?
>
> If that set of conditions is too large it might be too much burden.
>
> Here are some repercussions:
>
> FTSP - information who the root could be invalid. could force new election.
> CTP - have to flush the link/routing table. Other nodes might have to
> wait for state expiration.
> MultihopLQI - invalid parent information.
> Drip - conflicts in <nodeid,seq>
> etc.
>
> Should these protocols just boot up when ActiveMessageAddress.changed
> is signaled?


Is there a difference between booting up and reinitilizing?

I assume you mean reinitilizing/invalidating current state when changed is
signalled.
yes?

eric


>
>
> - om_p
> _______________________________________________
> Tinyos-devel mailing list
> Tinyos-devel at millennium.berkeley.edu
> https://www.millennium.berkeley.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tinyos-devel
>



-- 
Eric B. Decker
Senior (over 50 :-) Researcher
Autonomous Systems Lab
Jack Baskin School of Engineering
UCSC
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: https://www.millennium.berkeley.edu/pipermail/tinyos-devel/attachments/20090328/612f1e91/attachment.htm 


More information about the Tinyos-devel mailing list