[Tinyos-help] Re: Questions on CTP functioning

[Pedro Almeida]

Omprakash!

Thank you a lot for you interest and help in the subject!
I'll correct it in the code and see the result. I thought, when observing
that behaviour, it was just a delay till the ctp tree was fully
established...
I'll see how this goes now, thanks!

Very best regards,

Pedro Almeida

On 7/16/07, Omprakash Gnawali <gnawali at usc.edu> wrote:
>
>
> If you look in the code below in TestNetworkC.nc, you will notice that
> we take msg out of the queue but try to send recvPtr on the UART. We
> should send msg on the UART. This fix was discovered a long time ago
> but we had forgotten to update the CVS. I committed a fix for this
> problem to the CVS.
>
> > task void uartEchoTask() {
> > dbg("Traffic", "Sending packet to UART.\n");
> > if (call Queue.empty()) {
> > return;
> > }
> > else if (!uartbusy) {
> > message_t* msg = call Queue.dequeue();
> > dbg("Traffic", "Sending packet to UART.\n");
> > if (call UARTSend.send(0xffff, recvPtr, call Receive.payloadLength(msg)
> + 4)
> > == SUCCESS) {
> > uartbusy = TRUE;
> > }
> > /*else {
> > call CollectionDebug.logEventMsg(NET_C_DBG_2,
> > call CollectionPacket.getSequenceNumber(recvPtr),
> > call CollectionPacket.getOrigin(recvPtr),
> > call AMPacket.destination(recvPtr));
> > }*/
> > }
> > }
>
> - om_p
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mail.millennium.berkeley.edu/pipermail/tinyos-help/attachments/20070716/c1ed4297/attachment-0001.htm