No subject

significant advantage.

Of course you're free to encode/marshall any way you want :)

On Sun, May 25, 2008 at 3:30 PM, Nicola Wegner
<nicola.wegner at googlemail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have a question about common practice in using the AM Type.
>
> I want to define a protocol with different types of packets.
>
> Should I use one AM Type for the whole protocol and distinguish between the
> different kind of packets by using a custom "subtype" field at the beginning
> of every payload struct?
>
> Or should I use a different AM Type for every packet type? When so, is there
> a different way of sending packets with different AM Types beside using
> multiple instances of AMSend?
>
>
> And a question about the Tutorial "Mote-mote radio communication":
> In the receive event the length of the payload is checked but not the AM
> Type. Is there a specific reason for this practice?
>
> Thanks in advance for your help
>
> Nicola
>
> _______________________________________________
> Tinyos-help mailing list
> Tinyos-help at millennium.berkeley.edu
> https://www.millennium.berkeley.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tinyos-help
>