[Tinyos-host-mote-wg] Re: [Tinyos-2.0wg] proposed Scheduler interface change

[Philip Levis]

On Oct 15, 2005, at 11:53 AM, Cory Sharp wrote:

> I think the interface change sounds good, since it's more directly
> expresses in the intended use of the interface -- that sleep(TRUE) was
> only intended for use inside the taskLoop anyway.
>
> But, is the primary savings coming from having the "while no task"
> loop inside the atomic section?  That seems like the only significant
> practical change from the current method of while(1)
> runNextTask(TRUE).

I think there are also issues of inlining/component boundaries.

Phil

_______________________________________________
Tinyos-2.0wg mailing list
Tinyos-2.0wg at Mail.Millennium.Berkeley.EDU
https://mail.millennium.berkeley.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tinyos-2.0wg