[Tinyos-host-mote-wg] Re: [Tinyos-2.0wg] Re: [Tinyos-2-commits]
CVS: tinyos-2.x/tos/chips/cc2420 CC2420Command.nc, NONE, 1.1.2.1
CC2420ControlP.nc, NONE, 1.1.2.1 CC2420RadioP.nc, NONE, 1.1.2.1
CC2420Ram.nc, NONE, 1.1.2.1 CC2420ActiveMessageC.nc, 1.1.2.1, 1.1.2.2
CC2420ActiveMessageP.nc, 1.1
Philip Levis
pal at cs.stanford.edu
Mon Sep 12 15:12:13 PDT 2005
- Previous message: [Tinyos-host-mote-wg] [Tinyos-2.0wg] Re: [Tinyos-2-commits] CVS:
tinyos-2.x/tos/chips/cc2420
CC2420Command.nc, NONE, 1.1.2.1 CC2420ControlP.nc, NONE, 1.1.2.1
CC2420RadioP.nc, NONE, 1.1.2.1 CC2420Ram.nc, NONE, 1.1.2.1
CC2420ActiveMessageC.nc, 1.1.2.1, 1.1.2.2 CC2420ActiveMessageP.nc, 1.1
- Next message: [Tinyos-host-mote-wg] [Tinyos-2.0wg] Meeting 14 September: 11AM PDT
- Messages sorted by:
[ date ]
[ thread ]
[ subject ]
[ author ]
On Mon, 2005-09-12 at 13:33 -0700, Philip Levis wrote:
>
>
> >
> > We had this debate back in April 04. Basically the split phase makes
> > it impossible to deal with from a logic perspective.
>
> I think that the command marshaling approach could make it possible. A
> lot of it comes down to the granularity at which you acquire the bus. I
> plan on starting with fine grained acquisition and then maybe exploring
> finer grained access.
Today is a muddled day. I meant start with COARSE grained access. :)
Phil
_______________________________________________
Tinyos-2.0wg mailing list
Tinyos-2.0wg at Mail.Millennium.Berkeley.EDU
https://mail.millennium.berkeley.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tinyos-2.0wg
- Previous message: [Tinyos-host-mote-wg] [Tinyos-2.0wg] Re: [Tinyos-2-commits] CVS:
tinyos-2.x/tos/chips/cc2420
CC2420Command.nc, NONE, 1.1.2.1 CC2420ControlP.nc, NONE, 1.1.2.1
CC2420RadioP.nc, NONE, 1.1.2.1 CC2420Ram.nc, NONE, 1.1.2.1
CC2420ActiveMessageC.nc, 1.1.2.1, 1.1.2.2 CC2420ActiveMessageP.nc, 1.1
- Next message: [Tinyos-host-mote-wg] [Tinyos-2.0wg] Meeting 14 September: 11AM PDT
- Messages sorted by:
[ date ]
[ thread ]
[ subject ]
[ author ]
More information about the Tinyos-host-mote-wg
mailing list